5 MIN READ
ESG investing means something different to just about everyone. While all can agree that the acronym stands for Environmental, Social, and Governance, beyond that, things start to get hazy. There are mountains of data, hundreds if not thousands of academic pieces, and a seemingly infinite number of opinions on the topic. I am not here to settle any debates or draw definitive conclusions, but as the Head of XY Investment Solutions’ (XYIS) Investment Committee, I would like to illustrate how we approach ESG investing in the XYIS Cause series of portfolio models.
One of the most debated points in this topic area is whether it is better to exclude companies from the portfolio if they do not adhere to or espouse one’s ESG principles (known as a “negative” screening), or to channel assets only to the leaders in these areas (“positive” screening).
Another approach is to invest and take an active role to influence the companies’ policies and practices.
Still another version is known as “Impact Investing,” whereby we may not just seek to identify generically “good” or “bad” companies, but invest in projects that are exclusively focused on a specific positive outcome. An example of this is Apple’s issuance of $1BN worth of “green bonds” to fund construction of wind and solar projects to power their facilities (shares of this bond are held by Praxis Impact Bond Fund in the XYIS Cause portfolio).
All of these approaches have merit, for sure, and it is impossible to choose whether one way is superior to another on behalf of another values-oriented investor.
Another component for consideration is whether or how to weigh one of the ESG factors over another. For example, what if a company is lauded for its environmental record, but does not do well in governance areas like gender or racial diversity? In this scenario, an investor taking the very popular “Fossil Fuel Free” approach would likely not want the same holdings as one whose primary interest is to see more female directors and officers at their portfolio companies.
A recent survey of XYPN indicated that our members are split among the most important factor:
As you can see, once you include all the variables, and consider that the “E,” the “S,” and the “G” have dozens of individual sub-categories each, there are as many combinations and iterations of approaches to ESG investing as there are opinions among investors.
To make matters more difficult, a significant challenge for any ESG investor is how, and how stringently, to perform the required due diligence. One only need to consider the Volkswagen emissions scandal from a few years ago as an example. On the surface, VW looked like the darling of the auto industry for environment-minded investors (not to mention car buyers!) based on their emissions scores. That is until it was disclosed that they cheated on the tests.
The depth and breadth of the scandal is enough to generate concern that similar “greenwashing” may be happening in more places and going unnoticed.
How, then, is a Main Street investor supposed to have the access and knowledge to foil such a devious plan by the likes of Volkswagen?
To be sure, we do not think we should throw our hands up on ESG simply because it is difficult. On the contrary, we believe it is important not to rely on the self-reported virtues of Earth’s corporate citizens, but instead to partner with firms whose sole mission is to hold these companies to a higher standard on behalf of interested investors.
Specifically, this is why the XYIS Cause portfolios use professionally-managed mutual funds by companies with established track records and the seal of approval from investors who believe that “doing well by doing good” is more than just a catch phrase.
For many of the reasons cited above, our approach is not to try to create a separate flavor ESG portfolio for every palate, but rather build portfolios that satisfy investors with a broader approach. For investors who want a custom-tailored portfolio according to their own specific values, please contact the XYIS team about constructing a unique portfolio under our “Craft” umbrella.
For XYIS advisors approved for Dimensional Fund Advisors’ portfolios (the “Cause DFA” series), XYIS utilizes a blend of Sustainability and Social Core funds. DFA has a proprietary approach to each type; we encourage reaching out to your contact for detailed information.
The XYIS “Cause” portfolios attempt to mimic our Core models in their overall global allocation by using ESG funds on TD Ameritrade’s No Transaction Fee fund list. We presently use funds from household names in the space such as Calvert, Parnassus, PAX, Praxis, and TIAA-CREF. We will continue to monitor the available funds to improve based on investment and ESG criteria.
As always, we welcome any contribution from our advisor community to help improve our offerings.
About the Author
Mario Nardone, CFA, is Head of XY Investment Solutions' (XYIS) Investment Committee. His investment career began with 10 years at Vanguard, where he consulted institutions and financial advisors on investment policy, portfolio construction, Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs), and trading strategies as a member of Vanguard’s Fiduciary Services and ETF Product Management units. Through a relationship with his firm, East Bay Financial Services, Mario leads the XYIS Investment Committee and provides day-to-day investment support to advisors on the platform. His approach to investments and the industry has been featured in Investment News, NAPFA Advisor Magazine, Charleston Regional Business Journal, The Post & Courier, and The Northeast Pennsylvania Business Journal.